What survives in the landscape amounts to vague traces of a square-shaped earthwork, subtle enough that it took a local informant to flag it as a probable antiquity at all.

The site's paper trail is itself a quiet puzzle. When the Ordnance Survey produced its first six-inch map of the area in 1838, a sub-circular earthwork was recorded at this location, the kind of low, rounded enclosure that might once have served as a farmstead, a ritual site, or a boundary marker of some kind. But the feature does not appear on any subsequent edition of the OS maps, suggesting it had already become difficult to trace by the mid-nineteenth century or was simply omitted as cartographic priorities shifted. By 1978, when a Mr Cecil English drew attention to the remains, what was visible on the ground had taken on a noticeably square shape rather than the curved outline shown in the earlier survey, a discrepancy that raises more questions than it answers about whether the two descriptions refer to the same feature, or whether the earthwork was always ambiguous enough to invite different readings depending on who was looking.