That absence is part of what makes the site quietly odd: something substantial enough to measure roughly 84 metres north to south and 78 metres east to west, with surviving earth and stone banks, an external fosse, and a legible interior, went entirely unrecognised by nineteenth-century mapmakers as anything out of the ordinary. The 1837 OS edition recorded the area simply as rock outcrop, bounded on several sides by a townland boundary. It was only through aerial photography, taken in July 1966, that the curving earthwork and internal complexity of the site became properly apparent.

What survives is a sub-circular enclosure defined by a combination of a stone wall along its south-western to northern arc, where it doubles as the townland boundary with Irishtown, and an earth and stone bank elsewhere, with traces of an external ditch still visible. Inside, low earthen banks divide the space into small rectangular and sub-rectangular plots, and a natural rise or mound in the eastern quadrant is itself surrounded by a low earthen bank, best preserved along its north-eastern, eastern, and southern sides. Towards the north-west of the interior, a small circular anomaly has been identified as a probable hut site. The townland boundary cuts across the enclosing elements rather than following them consistently, which suggests the boundary was imposed later, long after whatever settlement or enclosure came first. Forty-five metres to the east, in a neighbouring field, the remains of two larger rectangular enclosures may be related to the main circular feature. Cultivation ridges are visible in the fields immediately to the east and south, and some of the earthworks may also reflect post-medieval quarrying activity, given the natural rock outcrop beneath the site.

Classifying the monument with any confidence is difficult. The most plausible interpretation is that it represents the remains of a small clustered settlement, the kind of enclosed rural grouping in which a handful of households shared a defined space, their individual plots and structures still faintly legible in the earthworks. But the combination of possible quarrying, later boundary imposition, and the fragmentary nature of the western interior means that several layers of activity, across different periods, may be tangled together here.