What makes them quietly odd is not simply their age or their setting, but the fact that each was built in a completely different way. One is rectangular, the other circular, and the two forms were deliberately conjoined into a single structure, suggesting either a change of mind, a change of builder, or a practical addition made at some later point to an already-standing dwelling.

The rectangular southern hut, roughly 4.3 by 3.6 metres, preserves several interior details that raise more questions than they answer. There is a small wall-cupboard set into the fabric of the wall, and in the north-east corner a low recess at ground level, just 0.8 metres wide and 0.25 metres high, not quite large enough for a person but possibly intended for storage of some kind. More puzzling still is a roughly D-shaped area of the floor, measuring about 1.6 by 2.6 metres, which has been deliberately enclosed by a setting of stones. Nobody has yet established what this internal subdivision was for. The northern hut is circular and built by corbelling, a technique in which courses of drystone are laid so that each projects slightly inward over the one below, gradually closing the roof without the need for timber; this produces a beehive-shaped chamber. At 3.8 metres in diameter and still standing 1.1 metres high, it retains a clear sense of its original form. Both structures were documented in the 1986 Dingle Peninsula archaeological survey compiled by J. Cuppage for Oidhreacht Chorca Dhuibhne, a survey that remains one of the most detailed records of the peninsula's early built environment.