That combination, a cashel amid an ancient stone setting, with no comparable example nearby despite an abundance of local outcrop, gives the site an anomalous quality that archaeologists have noted but not fully resolved. A cashel is a ringfort defined by a stone wall rather than an earthen bank, typically associated with an enclosed farmstead of the early medieval period, and this example follows that basic form. But the suggestion that it may have functioned primarily as a landscape feature rather than a domestic enclosure sets it apart from the ordinary run of such monuments.

The site makes use of a natural hillock, its edges built up with clay faced with stone to create a level interior platform. The enclosing wall, slightly oval in plan and measuring roughly 25 metres north to south and just under 29 metres east to west, is now considerably eroded, standing less than a metre on its exterior face. Much of that erosion is probably not natural. Stone field walls running close to the west and south of the site suggest that material was robbed from the cashel over time to serve more immediate agricultural needs. An entrance some two metres wide was recorded in the eastern sector by Stout in 1984, though it has since been obscured by scrub growth and collapse. There is no outer fosse, the defensive ditch sometimes found encircling monuments of this type. A scatter of trees, including ash, now grows within the interior. The surrounding standing stones, known as the Cullaun or Timoney stones, form one of the more extensive megalithic groupings in Tipperary, and the cashel sits within that broader complex without any obvious explanation of how the two relate chronologically or functionally.